RAID Level Comparison Table
Ready to get started?
You can mail us your storage media or visit our company address.
Dec-26,2025
When running in a critical state, server performance degrades, but it continues to operate. In most cases, the system recognizes this condition and replaces the suspect drive, and the RAID rebuilds as designed. If a second drive goes offline while operating in the critical state, there is insufficient parity information for calculation, the RAID crashes, and all data on the array becomes inaccessible.The first method to prevent permanent data loss due to a faulty rebuild is to regularly check the RAID's status. You should ensure all drives are functioning normally and address any issues found while the array is still operational. It is a good idea to regularly check your additional backups of critical data, especially before attempting to rebuild a failed RAID.The minimum RAID rebuild time is a function of several variables, including hard drive capacity, hard drive data rate, data bus bandwidth, the number of drives on the bus, and the sustained I/O load on the array. A 2 TB hard drive may take 40 hours or longer to recover.RAID manufacturers vary greatly in the internal components and circuit design of their hardware. In-depth knowledge of these designs is essential for successful RAID data recovery. However, since manufacturers do not disclose this information, RAID recovery techniques require years of development and reverse engineering to determine which are most effective.
RAID Level Comparison Table
| Feature | RAID 0 | RAID 1 | RAID 1E | RAID 5 | RAID 5EE |
| Minimum Drives | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 4 |
| Data Protection | None | Single Drive Failure | Single Drive Failure | Single Drive Failure | Single Drive Failure |
| Read Performance | High | High | High | High | High |
| Write Performance | High | Medium | Medium | Low | Low |
| Read Performance (Degraded) | N/A | Medium | High | Low | Low |
| Write Performance (Degraded) | N/A | High | High | Low | Low |
| Capacity Utilization | 100% | 50% | 50% | 67% - 94% | 50% - 88% |
| Typical Applications | High-end workstations, data logging, real-time rendering, scratch data | Operating systems, transactional databases | Operating systems, transactional databases | Data warehousing, Web serving, archiving | Data warehousing, Web serving, archiving |
| Feature | RAID 6 | RAID 10 | RAID 50 | RAID 60 |
| Minimum Drives | 4 | 4 | 6 | 8 |
| Data Protection | Two Drive Failures | Up to one disk failure per sub-array | Up to one disk failure per sub-array | Up to two disk failures per sub-array |
| Read Performance | High | High | High | High |
| Write Performance | Low | Medium | Medium | Medium |
| Read Performance (Degraded) | Low | High | Medium | Medium |
| Write Performance (Degraded) | Low | High | Medium | Low |
| Capacity Utilization | 50% - 88% | 50% | 67% - 94% | 50% - 88% |
| Typical Applications | Data archiving, disk backup, high-availability solutions, high-capacity servers | Fast databases, application servers | Large databases, file servers, application servers | Data archiving, disk backup, high-availability solutions, high-capacity servers |
RAID Array Types
| RAID Type | Software-Based | Hardware-Based | External Hardware |
| Description | Best suited for applications with large data blocks, such as data warehouses or video streaming. Also suitable for servers with available CPU cycles to manage I/O-intensive operations required for some RAID levels. Included in the operating system, e.g., Windows®, Netware, and Linux. All RAID functions are handled by the host CPU, which can severely tax its ability to perform other computations. | Best suited for applications with small data blocks, such as transactional databases and web servers. Processor-intensive RAID operations are offloaded from the host CPU for performance. Battery-backed write-back cache can significantly improve performance without increasing the risk of data loss. | Connected to the server via a standard controller. RAID functions are executed on a microprocessor located on the external RAID controller, independent of the host. |
| Advantages | Low cost Only requires a standard controller | Data protection and performance benefits of RAID Enhanced fault tolerance and higher performance compared to software-based RAID | Operating system independent Build high-capacity storage systems for high-end servers |
RAID arrays with different architectures may be similar, but each type also has its "common" failures and different handling techniques.
In a redundant RAID 5 configuration, one drive can go offline, the distributed parity can be calculated dynamically, and user data will be presented normally. This is known as the 'critical state'. Understanding these mechanisms is crucial for effective RAID data recovery, especially in the critical state where timely intervention can prevent data loss.When running in a critical state, server performance degrades, but it continues to operate. In most cases, the system recognizes this condition and replaces the suspect drive, and the RAID rebuilds as designed. If a second drive goes offline while operating in the critical state, there is insufficient parity information for calculation, the RAID crashes, and all data on the array becomes inaccessible.The first method to prevent permanent data loss due to a faulty rebuild is to regularly check the RAID's status. You should ensure all drives are functioning normally and address any issues found while the array is still operational. It is a good idea to regularly check your additional backups of critical data, especially before attempting to rebuild a failed RAID.The minimum RAID rebuild time is a function of several variables, including hard drive capacity, hard drive data rate, data bus bandwidth, the number of drives on the bus, and the sustained I/O load on the array. A 2 TB hard drive may take 40 hours or longer to recover.RAID manufacturers vary greatly in the internal components and circuit design of their hardware. In-depth knowledge of these designs is essential for successful RAID data recovery. However, since manufacturers do not disclose this information, RAID recovery techniques require years of development and reverse engineering to determine which are most effective.